Who owns scholarship?

Two interesting articles this week press on the concern of my last post, “Creative Commons”. Part of the aim of our Great Writers Inspire project is to make high-quality, research-inspired material on literary topics freely available on the web. Part of Fitzpatrick’s excellent critique of academic publishing in Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy is about library costs, publishing profits, and the paradox that universities effectively salary their research staff while they are writing their books and articles, and pay again for the journals or monographs they produce. Using the internet to take out some of the costs of the reproduction of scholarship – given that for many, but not all academic writers the costs of production of that scholarship are paid for in their salary – seems one way to cut out a commercial middleman, as well as to harness some of the benefits of more extended peer review. It’s part of a number of suggestions in this piece by Martin Paul Eve in the Guardian .
Open access scholarship seems such an obviously good thing for academics who are employed in a publicly funded university – just – like Oxford that it is interesting to read contrary views, as here in the “Times Higher Education Supplement. In part the Oxford colleagues quoted here are talking about something different – sacrificing a regular academic salary because of an expectation of income from previous publications, for instance – but there is also a statement of principle, and the idea that the academic worker whose work is freely available allows his or her labour to be undervalued precisely because it opts out of the consumer model. Interesting. It reminds me of a successful businessman who told me I should charge for my

This entry was posted in resource, rights. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Who owns scholarship?

  1. Pat says:

    “All the worlds a stage, and we are merely payers”

    Exeunt, wearing coat, pursuant by a bear

  2. I’d pay up to 15p, Emma.

    It’s interesting to think about the difference here between the issues for unsalaried creative writers and salaried academics. Copyright was a hot topic amongst writers in the period I work on (early 20C), and there are some famous instances of piracy of contemporary novelists’ work–Samuel Roth’s publication of sections of Ulysses, for example: Joyce took out an injunction to prevent him. But in that debate the point made was that contemporary writers, especially experimental writers, were finding it difficult to sell their work and make a living, yet publishers were able to make money out of their labour, due to gaps in international copyright law. I agree with Emma that salaried academics are being paid to spread and generate knowledge, and that’s part of our duty. But what of a fairly recent phenomenon: salaried creative writers?

  3. Alex Pryce says:

    It strikes me that the debate on the value of scholarship and who profits from research comes on the back of the increases in student fees. It is part of the growing tides of concern that education is only an option for the rich (again).

    Another option for your potential lecture podcast business, Emma, is the ‘pay-what-you-like’ system many music artists are trialling. Oxford’s own Radiohead are the most high profile example of this with their 2007 album ‘In Rainbows’ – http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1666973,00.html

  4. emmasmith says:

    Thanks, Alex: the Radiohead model is interesting. But it does all buy into – even our language does! – the idea of education and research as a commodity in the market, rather than as something like a public good.
    Do you think the rise in student fees will mean that the academy becomes less interested in published research (less financial emphasis on the REF) and more interested in teaching? Just reading Stefan Collini’s What are Universities For? http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/feb/24/threat-to-our-univerisities?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s